USPTO serial 75683523
FTP-TELNET COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, TAMI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FTP-TELNET COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas E. White
DOUGLAS E WHITE14 CAMINO SOBRANTEORINDA, CA 94563UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; and computer consultation | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |