USPTO serial 75683618
OXFORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OXFORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oxford Aviation Services Limited
Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1RA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAI & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for flight simulation for training and for education purposes relating to aviation | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Educational material and printed matter all relating to aviation and pilots' training, and to training of engineers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and training services relating to pilot training and ground instruction to pilots and engineers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |