USPTO serial 75683729
KARMALITE TREATS SINFULLY GOOD...WITHOUT THE GUILT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3058352Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2006
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KARMALITE TREATS SINFULLY GOOD...WITHOUT THE GUILT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Candy, bakery goods, herbal food beverages, cereal-based snack food bars | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HERBACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HERBACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Brent W.
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Brent W.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KARMALITE TREATS SINFULLY GOOD...WITHOUT THE GUILT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2006 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |