USPTO serial 75684036
ROAD TO AVONLEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2016
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ROAD TO AVONLEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $2,493*
Plus Government fees of $4,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5R 3R3, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5R 3R3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Sanok
Jeffrey D. Sanok CROWELL & MORING LLPP.O. Box 14300Washington, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Computer software and interactive multimedia computer game programs combining one or more of sound, pictures, text and video imagery into an interactive or linear presentation on CD ROM or computer diskette featuring stories, games and clip art | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | (Based on 44(e)) Jewelry bracelets; earrings; necklaces; wall clocks; watches; pocket watches; stop watches; wrist watches; watches containing an electronic game function | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on 44(e)) Paper and paper articles, namely, trading cards, postcards; writing and note paper and pads; pens and pencils; stickers; appointment books; bookmarks; date books; exercise books and picture books; notebooks; memorandum books; telephone number books; series of pocket-sized fiction books; fan club newsletters; brochures and newsletters, all relating to cartoon motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | (Based on 44(e)) Beach bags; key cases; knapsacks; tote bags; back packs; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | (Based on 44(e)) Housewares, namely, mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on 44(e)) Clothing for men, women and children, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts; headwear, namely, hats; footwear, namely, shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | (Based on 44(e)) Toys, games, and playthings, namely, action figures and accessories therefor, dolls, soft sculpture dolls, doll clothing; board games and game equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; jigsaw puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ROAD TO AVONLEA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 19, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |