USPTO serial 75684139
FARMERS CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- GEORGE, DAHLIA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FARMERS CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
SOUTH BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
SOUTH BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Westlock, Alberta T7P 2P2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martha Gayle Barber
Martha Gayle Barber Alston & Bird LLP101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000Charlotte, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | plastic silage bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AT PLASTICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AT PLASTICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AT PLASTICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AT FILMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Alberta Ag-Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named FARMERS CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |