USPTO serial 75684259
THE SHARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SHARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent O. Wagner
VINCENT O WAGNER WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON,MORIARTY & MCNETT111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps for use in the field of gastroenterology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 13, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |