Drawing for BUSINESSFIRST

USPTO serial 75684271

BUSINESSFIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSINESSFIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine M. Baker

CHRISTINE M BAKER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY ET AL1 FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111-2621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultant and business management services, namely, providing to new and existing businesses information concerning and public access to economic development programs and support services provided by the State of Rhode Island or the State of Rhode Island in collaboration with universities and other businesses, such programs and services including development of international trade and exporting, science and technology development and transfer, human resources, job development and training, minority business development, financial assistance and loans, tax credits, site location, facilities design, and equipment and operations adviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 26, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance