USPTO serial 75684282
FREEBX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELSNER, KATHLEEN KEENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEBX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle D. Alpert, Esq
ROCHELLE D ALPERT ESQ BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment, namely, computer based telephony switch and computer software for telephone switching, voice mail, automated telephone answering messaging, and transferring, automated call distribution, and computer network access to and control over all telephone operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to electronic communications networks; telecommunications services, namely electronic transmission of voice, video, messages and data; IP telephony services; asynchronous transfer mode services; frame relay services; international call back services; providing access to electronic communications networks; video conferencing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | telecommunications services, namely, integration and consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vovida Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vovida Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FREEBX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |