USPTO serial 75684293
METAPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METAPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Irvine, CA
Deerfield, IL
Deerfield, IL
Irvine, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN M. OLSTER
KATHLEEN M OLSTER CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DEVICES FOR USE IN CARDIAC BYPASS SURGERY NAMELY, PUMPS, OXYGENATORS, HEAT EXCHANGERS, CARDIOTOMY AND VENOUS RESERVOIRS, CONNECTING TUBS, SAMPLING PORTS, PRESSURE MONITORING LINES, TRANSDUCER PROTECTORS AND PUMP DISPLAY AND CONTROL CONSOLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Baxter International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Baxter International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jostra Bentley Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named METAPLUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |