USPTO serial 75685069
SMART PLUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART PLUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical plug for a standard AC-plug housing that monitors the power line for voltage and current spikes or variations in voltage or electric current and records changes in the line, namely, the elapsed time of usage, maximum and minimum line voltage, and maximum current draw, and reads back the data to a personal computer through a user interface, for the purpose of monitoring energy consumption or to determine wear and tear on power tools; computer software for use in converting data from electrical plug, which monitors the current and voltage variations, to a computer readable and displayable form | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |