Drawing for LUMO

USPTO serial 75685405

LUMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042research, development and design of computer software for othersACTIVEJun 10, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 13, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 28, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2003LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE—
Oct 7, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Aug 7, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance