Drawing for SMART PLY

USPTO serial 75686438

SMART PLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SMART PLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas D. Herman

THOMAS D HERMAN SMITH & DUGGANTWO CTR PLZ 6TH FLBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Active fiber composite materials, namely piezoelectric devices and electroactive fibers and materials, consisting of actuators, sensors and electrical and mechanical control devices, specifically electroactive assemblies and package piezoelectric or other electroactive fibers used for actuating, sensing, vibration or motion control and the generation of power from motion, and for applying strain or forces to surfaces in a wide variety of objects, specifically in tennis, squash and racquetball racquets, in skis, ski boots, in golf clubs, in bicycles, in vehicles, namely automobile chassis and tires, in aircraft fuselages, wing surfaces, flaps and fins, in marine vehicles, namely submarines and torpedoes, in helicopter fuselages and rotor blades, in computer hardware, namely disc drives and printers, in medical products, namely pacemakers, endoscopes, in audio equipment, namely speakers, amplifiers, receivers, in noise reduction equipment, in cellular telephones, in portable and hand-held consumer electronic devices, in industrial automation and process control actuators and sensors, namely those that control or measure pressure, temperature, vibration, and liquid flowACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance