Drawing for THE FUSION GROUP OF COMPANIES INTEGRATING THECORPORATION

USPTO serial 75686747

THE FUSION GROUP OF COMPANIES INTEGRATING THECORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE FUSION GROUP OF COMPANIES INTEGRATING THECORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed instructional, educational and teaching materials in the areas of presentation, communication and management skills; publications, namely, books and manuals featuring presentation, communication and management skillsACTIVEJan 1, 1998
035Business management consulting services in the fields of executive development, brand management, corporate identify and mission statements and logo designsACTIVEJan 1, 1998
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the fields of presentation, communications and management skills, message and materials development and new business acquisition practicesACTIVEJan 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance