USPTO serial 75686997
MUGGERS BREW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUGGERS BREW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mont-Royal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Eugene Dick
RICHARD EUGENE DICK LAW OFFICE OF DICK AND HARRIS181 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric coffee makers for commercial and domestic use; electric espresso machines for commercial and domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Mugs; cups; non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal; non-electric teapots not of precious metal; canister sets; trivets; coffee measures for domestic use; hand operated coffee grinders and mills; non-electric coffee makers; thermal insulated bottles sold empty; insulated cups; non-paper reusable coffee filters; plastic coasters; collapsible cup carriers and caddies; insulated vacuum bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Ground and whole bean coffee; cocoa; tea; spices; herb tea for food; powdered chocolate; flavoring syrup; baked goods, namely muffins, pastries, cookies, breads, and cakes; confections, namely chocolate truffles, chocolate covered beans, chocolate covered cherries and chocolate covered nuts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |