USPTO serial 75687005
DECISION ENGINEERING ANALYZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2001
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DECISION ENGINEERING ANALYZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L. DUPRE
JOHN L. DUPRE HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, PC530 VIRGINIA ROAD PO BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 017429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | system of computer software programs that provide conceptual designs, capital and cost estimates for studying technology selection or upgrades for construction and investment in the chemical processing, energy producing, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, food, pulp and paper, ore beneficial and other industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Icarus Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Icarus Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DECISION ENGINEERING ANALYZER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |