USPTO serial 75687207
TRANSCANADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANSCANADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4K5, CA
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4K5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CARBON BLACK FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE AND, PARTICULARLY, FOR USE IN THE PLASTIC INDUSTRY, SYNTHETIC RUBBER INDUSTRY, AND THE VEHICLE TIRE INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | EXTRACTION AND PROCESSING OF LIQUIDS FROM NATURAL GAS; THE MANUFACTURE OR CARBON BLACK TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named TRANSCANADA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |