USPTO serial 75687383
HOTELWIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2001
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOTELWIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
East Greenville, PA
East Greenville, PA
EAST GREENVILLE, PA
ATLANTA, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLPOne Lincoln StreetState Street Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; arranging travel tours and travel information services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for temporary lodging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1 travel. com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 1 travel. com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ONETRAVEL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRAVELOGIX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HOTELWIZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |