USPTO serial 75687474
ALLISON & CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLISON & CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Iris Hess
M IRIS HESS LADAS 9 PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | 'Women's clothing, namely jackets, skirts, blouses, pants, leggings, shorts, pant suits, shirts, camp shirts, coats, sweaters, pull-overs, cardigans, tunics, housecoats, jumpers, jump suits, gilets, jeans, t-shirts, t-tops, vests, tank tops, knit tops, culottes and suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |