Drawing for SUPERNET

USPTO serial 75687727

SUPERNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn R. Wilson

Glenn R. Wilson McIntyre, Kahn & Kruse Co. L.P.A.1301 East Ninth StreetSuite 2200Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036ADMINISTRATION OF MANAGED CARE HEALTH INSURANCE PRODUCTSACTIVE
042HEALTHCARE SERVICES, NAMELY, PREFERRED PROVIDER PROGRAMSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Nov 11, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 15, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 1, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 5, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 8, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 8, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 8, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 8, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 9, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance