USPTO serial 75687880
PURALIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURALIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL P. BURKE
DANIEL P BURKE GALGANO & BURKECOURTHOUSE BLDG300 RABRO DR STE 135HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC TEST KITS COMPRISING PREGNANCY TEST KITS FOR HOME USE AND OVER THE COUNTER PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, DECONGESTANTS, WEIGHT LOSS PREPARATIONS, ARTHRITIS PREPARATIONS, ANALGESICS AND ANTACIDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |