USPTO serial 75687931
POSEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-723 53 Vasteras, SE
SE-723 53 Vasteras, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C Holman
JOHN C HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for measuring, indicating, and checking the position and orientation of robots, vehicles, conveyors, cameras, displays and detectors to assist in the control of robots, vehicles, conveyors, cameras, displays and detectors, namely the following apparatus and instruments, computers, computer operating programs, timing sensors, electric regulating apparatus for regulating positions and orientations, detectors and indicators, computer monitors, video displays, optical character readers, cameras, cinematographic cameras, remote control apparatus, x-ray equipment, scanners, optical lenses, joysticks, control panels, and sight equipment; blank magnetic computer tapes and optical discs; blank magnetic data carriers; computer programs for use in controlling the function and activities of robots, vehicles, conveyors, cameras, displays and detectors; laboratory robots and personal and hobby use robots | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |