Drawing for ZONENETWORK.COM

USPTO serial 75688008

ZONENETWORK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZONENETWORK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GLENN P. RICKARDS

GLENN P. RICKARDS DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1420 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for educational and entertainment purposes in the field of outdoor recreationACTIVE—
035dissemination of advertising for others relating to outdoor activities via an on-line electronic communication network; on-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of items used in connection with mountaineering and related outdoor activitiesACTIVE—
038radio, television and internet broadcasting servicesACTIVE—
039arranging travel tours for othersACTIVE—
041providing an interactive web site featuring information about outdoor recreational activities; radio, television and Internet programming schedulingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 22, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 1, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance