Drawing for PRO-TECH

USPTO serial 75688097

PRO-TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO-TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY L BRAGG

GARY L BRAGG O'NEIL BRAGG & STAFFIN PC531 PLYMOUTH RD STE 500PLYMOUTH MEETING, PA 19462UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture namely metal chairs on swivel basesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 30, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 8, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 18, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 19, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 25, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance