Drawing for ETIS

USPTO serial 75688514

ETIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ETIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS LANGER

THOMAS LANGER FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN, LANGER767 THIRD AVE - 25TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-2023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC MEMORY CARDS; DEVICES FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS USING ELECTRONIC MEMORY CARDS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC MEMORY CARD TERMINALS AND SERVERS; SOFTWARE TOOLS AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC MEMORY CARDSACTIVE—
035BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, INSTALLING AND OPERATING SYSTEMS UTILIZING ELECTRONIC PAYMENT CARDSACTIVE—
042CONSULTING SERVICES FOR ASSISTING BANKING COMPANIES WITH INTEGRATION FROM MAGNETIC STRIPE CARDS TO OTHER PAYMENT SCHEMES, CARD ISSUANCE, ELECTRONIC PURSE, AND AND MULTI-APPLICATION IMPLEMENTATIONS; CONSULTING SERVICES FOR ASSISTING MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANIES WITH VALUE-ADDED SERVICES IN THE GSM ENVIRONMENT, PERSONALIZATION AND OVER-THE-AIR CUSTOMIZATION, PREPAYMENT SOLUTIONS, AND SECURITY SCHEMES; CONSULTING SERVICES FOR ASSISTING WIRELINE TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANIES WITH ELECTRONIC PURSE, PREPAYMENT SOLUTIONS AND SECURITY SCHEMESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance