USPTO serial 75688879
IWC INTERACTIVE WEB CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IWC INTERACTIVE WEB CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS SCHNECK
P O BOX 2-ESAN JOSE, CA 95109-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DESIGN AND CONSULTATION REGARDING WEBSITE NAVIGATION, CUSTOM SEARCH ENGINES, GRAPHICS AND LAYOUT OF WEB PAGES, USER INTERFACE DEVELOPMENT FOR WEB PAGES, USABILITY ANALYSIS REGARDING WEB PAGES, GLOBALIZATION OF WEB PAGE CONTENT, MULTIMEDIA CREATION FOR WEBSITES, INCLUDING ANIMATION, DESIGN OF MULTIMEDIA EFFECTS, DESIGN OF METHODS FOR STREAMING AUDIO AND VIDEO, DESIGN OF PRODUCT DEMONSTRATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS, ALL ON WEBSITES; WEB CONTENT DEVELOPMENT AND CONSULTATION REGARDING WEB PAGE CONTENT AND VERSION MANAGEMENT, DATA MINING USING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION, STRATEGIC ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION MARKETING, INTERACTIVE WEB CONCEPTS INCLUDING ADVERTISING AND PRODUCT DELIVERY; VENDOR INTEGRATION INTO ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; SERVICE AND SUPPORT OF WEBSITES, INCLUDING WEBSITE HOSTING SERVICES, REAL-TIME ADMINISTRATION OF WEBSITES, PROVIDING TOOLS, METRICS AND STATISTICS FOR WEBSITES, ON-SITE TRAINING AND WORKSHOPS REGARDING WEBSITES, ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |