USPTO serial 75688910
FU-MAN SKEETO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FU-MAN SKEETO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christian T. Martin, Esq.
CHRISTIAN T MARTIN17056 LIVORNO DRPACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272-3231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MAIL ORDER CATALOG AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES BOTH PROVIDED BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND FEATURING WEARING APPAREL INCLUDING FOOTWEAR, HEADWEAR, AND ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |