USPTO serial 75688934
BABY TELEVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDGE, KATRINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABY TELEVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Hartford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer K. Lawson
JENNIFER K LAWSON CITYPLACE IDAY, BERRY & HOWARD LLPHARTFORD, CT 06103-3499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publications, namely, downloadable information via a global computer network in the area of public health, education, and information for parents and expectant parents | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Developing and hosting electronic commerce catalogs for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Computer services relating to providing on line information on a global computer network in the area of education | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing online information on a global computer network in the area of public health and information for parents and expectant parents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |