USPTO serial 75688937
BABY TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hartford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer K. Lawson
JENNIFER K LAWSON CITYPLACE IDAY, BERRY & HOWARD LLPHARTFORD, CT 06103-3499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Television broadcasting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |