Drawing for YOURCHOICE.COM

USPTO serial 75688946

YOURCHOICE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOURCHOICE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DARREN M GELIEBTER

Jon A. Dorf The Dorf Law Firm, LLP740 West Boston Post RoadSuite 304Mamaroneck, NY 10543

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035on-line wholesale distributorships featuring jewelry; mail order services featuring jewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 29, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 22, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 5, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 21, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 20001.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Mar 13, 20001.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance