USPTO serial 75689446
INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS WUNDERBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3159227Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS WUNDERBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf
SHERRI L ROHLF SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER100 WASHINGTON AVE SO STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements, snack bars containing soy protein, vitamins, minerals and herbs for nutritional purposes; and nutritional supplements in bar form containing soy protein, vitamins, minerals and herbs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2005 |
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry, fruits, fresh and bottled vegetables, jellies, jams, cooking and edible oils, nuts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS WUNDERBAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |