Drawing for THE DIAMOND

USPTO serial 75689644

THE DIAMOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALL, ALLISON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DIAMOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard B. Rockman

HOWARD B ROCKMAN LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMS, SWEENEY& OHLSONP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020AN UNFITTED SWIMMING POOL COVER CONTAINING AIR BUBBLESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 20, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 20, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 25, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 18, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 30, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 6, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 6, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 14, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance