USPTO serial 75689704
ERGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3851903Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ERGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40477 Dusseldorf, DE
40477 Dusseldorf, DE
40477 Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Fredbeck
ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance agencies in the field of home, fire, life, health, property and casualty insurance; insurance administration; claims adjustment in the field of insurance; insurance claims processing; insurance consultation; insurance actuarial services; appraisals for insurance claims of personal property and real estate; insurance brokerage; life, health, property and casualty insurance underwriting; legal expense insurance underwriting; financial affairs services, namely, financial services in the nature of an investment security | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2002 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |