USPTO serial 75690413
ROBOT GLADIATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBOT GLADIATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Friscia
MICHAEL R FRISCIA MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLPFOUR GATEWAY CTR100 MULBERRY STNEWARK, NJ 07102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the production of demonstrations and shows featuring fights between human and robot performers rendered live and through the media of television | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |