USPTO serial 75690416
MAN VS. MACHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAN VS. MACHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL R. FRISCIA
ROBERT KENT DAVIS12 PHILLIPS RD.MT. HOLLY, NJ 08060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PRODUCTION OF DEMONSTRATIONS AND SHOWS FEATURING FIGHTS BETWEEN HUMAN AND ROBOT PERFORMERS RENDERED LIVE AND THROUGH THE MEDIA OF TELEVISION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |