USPTO serial 75690807
COCKTAIL HOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COCKTAIL HOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dara F. McLeod
DARA F MCLEOD GARDNER CARTON & DOUGLAS321 N CLARK STCHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, tongs, cheese knives and cheese slicers, kitchen aluminum foil cutters | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Cookbooks; books about cocktails; paper napkins | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 1999 |
| 021 | beverage glassware; crystal stemware; nesting bowls; serving bowls; salt and pepper shakers; pepper mills; cruets and cruet sets not of precious metal; paper plates, cups and bowls; cream serving bowls; sugar bowls; butter dishes; chip and dip sets; spice racks; spice jars; lazy susans; serving platters; serving forks and spoons; salad serving forks and spoons; trays not of precious metal; carafes; canisters; crudites dishes; vodka glass sets; cheese boards; coasters not of paper and not being table linen; cocktail shakers; ice buckets; wine buckets; wine cooling containers; wine storing bags; wine racks; shot glasses; swizzle sticks; bottle stoppers; bottle openers | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |