Drawing for TCP

USPTO serial 75691699

TCP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAVONESE, DANIEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TCP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GRETCHEN R. BLUM

LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD2800 CHEMED CTR 255 E 5TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4728UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036funeral casket price guarantee services for funeral directorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 13, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance