Drawing for FLEXHEIGHT

USPTO serial 75691844

FLEXHEIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FLEXHEIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY P VENTURINO

ANTHONY P VENTURINO STEVENS DAVIS MILLER & MOSHER LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal building materials, namely transfer, finishing and dilation profiles used with floors, floor coverings, walls, wall coverings, ceilings and ceiling coverings, said profiles being made of aluminum or surface coated or clad aluminumACTIVE—
019Non-metal building materials, namely, transfer, finishing and dilation profiles used on floors, floor coverings, walls, wall coverings, ceiling and ceiling coverings, said profiles being made of thermoplastics of thermosetting plastics; non-metal building materials, namely, transfer, finishing and dilation profiles used with floors, floor coverings, walls, wall coverings, ceilings and ceiling coverings, said profiles being made of thermosetting laminates or thermosetting laminates bonded to particle board, fiber board, plywood or wood; non-metal building materials, namely, transfer finishing and dilation profiles used with floors, floor coverings, walls, wall coverings, ceilings and ceiling coverings, said profiles being made of wood, particle board, fiber board or plywoodACTIVE—
027Coverings for floors, walls and ceilings, said coverings being made of thermoplastics or thermosetting plastics; coverings for floors, walls and ceilings, said coverings being made of thermosetting laminates or thermosetting laminates bonded to particle board, fiber board, plywood or wood; coverings for floors, walls and ceilings, said coverings being made of wood, particle board, fiber board or plywoodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance