USPTO serial 75691898
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROCHELLE D. ALPERT
ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | electronic billing services; consultation in the field of electronic billing services; providing an online computer database in the field of billing information | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | electronic bill payment services and electronic transmission of bill payment data | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | computer services, namely, installation of computer hardware networks and systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | computer services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; providing on-line bulletin boards in the field of billing; and providing on-line real-time chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning topics of general interest | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | electronic storage for others of billing data | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | computer services, namely, training in the use and operation of computer software for administering billing-related software for use via a global computer network and training in the field of programming computer software for use on a global computer network; and computer education training | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, computer programming for others; creating and maintaining web sites for others; designing and implementing network web pages for others; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; computer systems analysis; computer consultation; data conversion of computer program data; integration of computer systems and networks; and maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, trouble shooting of online billing via a global communications network, e-mail and telephone | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |