Drawing for BILLCARE

USPTO serial 75691898

BILLCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BILLCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROCHELLE D. ALPERT

ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035electronic billing services; consultation in the field of electronic billing services; providing an online computer database in the field of billing informationACTIVE—
036electronic bill payment services and electronic transmission of bill payment dataACTIVE—
037computer services, namely, installation of computer hardware networks and systemsACTIVE—
038computer services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; providing on-line bulletin boards in the field of billing; and providing on-line real-time chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning topics of general interestACTIVE—
039electronic storage for others of billing dataACTIVE—
041computer services, namely, training in the use and operation of computer software for administering billing-related software for use via a global computer network and training in the field of programming computer software for use on a global computer network; and computer education trainingACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, computer programming for others; creating and maintaining web sites for others; designing and implementing network web pages for others; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; computer systems analysis; computer consultation; data conversion of computer program data; integration of computer systems and networks; and maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, trouble shooting of online billing via a global communications network, e-mail and telephoneACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance