USPTO serial 75692118
GIGA POCKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIGA POCKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer application software for use in playing, recording and editing sound, image and data signals; computer application software for use in managing collections of sound, image and data signals on computer disc drives and computer software | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |