USPTO serial 75692192
PRENATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRENATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FIRST HORIZON PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
ROSWELL, GA
Other trademarks owned by FIRST HORIZON PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. BREWSTER
WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK & STOCKTON1100 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MULTIVITAMIN, MULTIMINERAL NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIRST HORIZON PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PRENATE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |