USPTO serial 75692627
HEALTHY 4 YOU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2508207Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2001
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEALTHY 4 YOU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danica Acosta
702 SW 8th StreetBentonville, AR 72761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [BAKERY GOODS; STAPLE FOODS, NAMELY COFFEE, TEA, FLOUR, MIXES FOR MAKING BAKERY GOODS, FROSTINGS,] BREAKFAST CEREAL, [SUGAR, CANDY, SAUCES, EXCLUDING APPLESAUCE AND CRANBERRY SAUCE, SPICES, MALT EXTRACTS FOR FOOD, PASTAS, CONDIMENT RELISHES, TABLE SYRUPS, VINEGAR, ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT, CONDIMENTS, NAMELY, FOOD FLAVORINGS AND SEASONINGS, POWDERED BEVERAGES MIXES FOR USE IN MAKING COFFEE, ICED TEA, COCOA, CHOCOLATE FOOD BEVERAGES NOT BEING DAIRY-BASED OR VEGETABLE-BASED, MILK SHAKES; PRETZELS, TORTILLA CHIPS; COOKIES; CRACKERS; CANDY; SALAD DRESSINGS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |