USPTO serial 75692665
MALL PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MALL PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI
PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER PC400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3322UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive computerized kiosks comprising computers, computer display monitors, light emitting diode displays and electric luminescent display panels for use in the electronic retrieval and display of audio-video-visual directory, advertising, inventory and ordering information | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Dissemination of advertising matter for others via a global computer network and electronic kiosks; providing directory information for retail environments of others via a global computer network and electronic kiosks; order processing and inventory control for retail stores of others via a global computer network and electronic kiosks; Providing a website, and providing electronic kiosks at retail shopping malls, for the purpose of managing the affinity and frequent shopper programs of various shopping malls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Computer Concepts Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Computer Concepts Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MALL PLUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |