USPTO serial 75692755
RCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen T. Olson
STEPHEN T OLSON HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | association services, namely, promoting the interests of research chefs, namely, chefs involved in academia, and in the development of culinary arts, of new food products and of menu items for restaurants, corporations and other organizations responsible for the marketing and serving of cuisine and of prepared and processed foods; by providing culinary, technical and nutritional information to the food industry, assisting association members in educational and professional development and encouraging adherence to professional certification standards and procedures | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |