USPTO serial 75693328
COMPAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-61352 Bad Homburg v.d.H, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARVEY B. JACOBSON, JR
HARVEY B JACOBSON JR JACOBSON,PRICE,HOLMAN & STERN,PLLC400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical, medical and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, a blood cell separator which separates blood into its different components, collects desired components and combinations of the different components and returns the non-collected parts to the donor or patient, for multi-component collection of standardized blood products and for extracorporeal blood treatment used in the fields of transfusion medicine, dialysis, blood bank services and hemtechnology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |