USPTO serial 75693345
E-Z MEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AN, GI HYUN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-Z MEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Greenwich, CT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared and processed foods and beverages, including meats, vegetables, fruits, starches and related foods, namely, aspargus, avocados, bacon, beans, baked beans, roasat beef, dairy based chocolate food, soup broth, cheese foods, cherries, chicken, chicken and dumplings, chile con queso, chili with or without beans, chowder, corned beef, corned beef hash, chicken and fish croquettes, dairy products, dairy based dips, powdered eggs, egg substitutes, entrees consisting prpimarilyof meat, fish, poultry with either rice or pasta and including vegetables, fish and chips, french fried potatoes, frankfurters, canned, dired and frozen fruits, hamburger meat, processed lamb, smoke salmon lox, luncheon meats, milk, chocolate milk, mushrooms, onion rings, pancakes, potato pancakes, salami, processed edible seafood, snack food, snack food dips, soup mixes, soups, cooked tomatoes, turkey, vegetable based food beverages, canned and bottled vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |