Drawing for NO COMMON SCENTS

USPTO serial 75693521

NO COMMON SCENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO COMMON SCENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARRY G. MAGIDOFF

PAUL J SUTTON GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bar and liquid skin soap; shower gels; foam baths, essential oils for personal use, bath and body oils, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair rinses, hand cream, skin moisturizing lotion, massage oil, toothpaste, mouthwash, nail polish and nail polish removerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2006ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 7, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 19, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance