USPTO serial 75693647
HEMOCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340412Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEMOCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-61352 Bad Homburg v.d.H., DE
D-61352 Bad Homburg v.d.H., DE
D-61352 Bad Homburg v.d.H., DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harvey B. Jacobson, Jr.
HARVEY B JACOBSON JR JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and 44(e)): Instruments used by blood banks, for blood donation and for collecting and processing stem cells from peripheral blood, namely, blood component separators; blood cell separators; instruments for blood collection, processing, mixing and weighing blood, namely, digital scales for collecting blood, tubing sealers, storage and transfer bags for cryogenic preservation of cellular blood components, including thrombocytes, stem cells, cord blood, bone marrow, cardiovascular grafts, bones and tissues; hemoconcentrators for removing plasma water and certain low molecular weight plasma solutes from blood; medical and surgical instruments, namely, continuous autotransfusion systems comprised of pumps, centrifuges, washing chambers; instruments for extracting substances from the blood, namely, absorbers, and housings and parts thereof; (Based on Section 44(e)): Medical and surgical instruments, namely, continuous autotransfusion systems comprised of pumps, centrifuges, washing chambers, blood transfusion bags and tubing for surgical hemotherapy and intensive care; filters and membranes for medical use, namely, leucocyte filters and blood filters; instruments for the infusion of pharmaceuticals, namely, pumps, syringes, intravenous tubing; pumps and machines for enteral and parenteral feeding and parts thereof; infusion and clinical fluid data management systems, namely, multi-channel infusion data management systems consisting of modules, syringe pumps, volumetric pumps, infusion pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |