USPTO serial 75694160
SENSEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SENSEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
162 87 Stockholm, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NODES, NAMELY, CIRCUITS AND SENSORS FOR THE FLOW OF INFORMATION IN ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS IN ORDER TO CONTROL, MONITOR, MEASURE AND DIRECT THE FUNCTIONS OF SAID APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK VIA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRICITY SUPPLY NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING DATABASES VIA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRICITY SUPPLY NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |