USPTO serial 75694205
BILLCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BILLCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE MCKNEW
LESLIE MCKNEW BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSEARS TWR1 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1420Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, a suite of software for use by customers in viewing bills, payment information and customer service information via a global computer network, namely, for use in bill distribution, bill delivery, bill presentment, bill payment, customer care, customer acquisition and enrollment, customer profiling, targeted marketing, and service provisioning, and instruction and user manuals provided in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AVOLENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AVOLENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Just In Time Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BILLCARE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |