USPTO serial 75694611
ALPHATIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPHATIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARC M GORELNIK
MARC M GORELNIK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alpha Research & Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alpha Research & Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ALPHATIDE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |